Titmouse produced what?!

mgx0:

So apparently me and foxyelie just recently found out that Titmouse not only made Randy Cunningham but they also produced Danny Phantom from 2003-2005. 

Is this true? :O

I checked all over the internet via several google searches, I can’t find anything that links titmouse and Danny besides the wiki page (which is freely editable and therefore an unreliable source) and another random fan’s blog post. As far as I can tell, Danny Phantom was produced by Billionfold and Nickelodeon Animation Studios. I could have missed something though.

to-be-a-heartattack:

Hello, humble plebs.

I am Bill Cipher, the omniscient being, and I open this ask -On my mainly Tumblr- to donate you my universal knowledge.

clevelandrock:

Nah. I’m pretty sure he’ll still be 13 in 20 years.

clevelandrock:

Nah. I’m pretty sure he’ll still be 13 in 20 years.

Hirokazu Tanaka, Takahiro Nishi, Natsumi Kameoka - I'm Finished!
256 plays

chaofanatic:

The single greatest game over theme in all of history.

Click for captions!

raphayella:

brandowave:

Just gonna leave this here

Raph omg

One of those is gonna be a gazed bishop JSYK

rusethefox:

is that groot

It’s the Hide Behind.
Come on, we haven’t already forgotten Anomaly # 132, have we?

rusethefox:

is that groot

It’s the Hide Behind.

Come on, we haven’t already forgotten Anomaly # 132, have we?

gravityfallstown:

Even in the boards, THIS SERIES IS THE BEST! xD

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue. 
Sign the petition, then spread the word.

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.

You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.

This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.

Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.

Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.

Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.

It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.

If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.

Sign the petition, then spread the word.

weirdblueman:

ibelieveinthilbo:

the—fandom—has—claimed—me:

ropunzel:

brigwife:

borrowed-blue-box:

REALLY, AGAIN? THE FUCKING REBLOG BUTTON WASRIGHTTHEREJESUS CRUST

jesus crust


this post is a mess

That is a tortilla. Tortillas do not have crusts.


resisting the urge to screenshot this again is probably the hardest challenge I’ve faced today

weirdblueman:

ibelieveinthilbo:

the—fandom—has—claimed—me:

ropunzel:

brigwife:

borrowed-blue-box:

REALLY, AGAIN? THE FUCKING REBLOG BUTTON WAS
RIGHT
THERE
JESUS CRUST

jesus crust

image

this post is a mess

That is a tortilla. Tortillas do not have crusts.

resisting the urge to screenshot this again is probably the hardest challenge I’ve faced today